home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT0732>
- <title>
- Jun. 06, 1994: Presidency:The Political Interest
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Jun. 06, 1994 The Man Who Beat Hitler
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- THE POLITICAL INTEREST, Page 26
- The Courage to Change
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>by Michael Kramer
- </p>
- <p> Retreat, some call it. Surrender, capitulation, appeasement.
- These are just a few of the damning words used by those who
- oppose Bill Clinton's decision to extend China's trading
- status as a most favored nation. The others aren't publishable--but all of them are wrong. The words that better describe
- the President's action are realistic and courageous. The question,
- as Clinton said last Thursday, is not whether the U.S. should
- pressure Beijing to improve its abysmal human-rights record.
- The question is how best to do it while ensuring that America
- gets a piece of the action in the world's fastest-growing economy.
- The two interests may appear antithetical, but they are not.
- </p>
- <p> For several reasons, Clinton is right to switch course and de-link
- the issues of human rights and trade. First, in threatening
- to throttle America's growing commerce with China because Beijing
- oppresses its citizens, the U.S. has stood alone. "No other
- nation agreed with us," said Clinton. "It wasn't like there
- was a big multinational coalition; it's not like sanctions on
- Iraq." Only America has annually debated forgoing trade with
- a nation that will spend more than $1 trillion during the next
- decade on infrastructure projects alone. Only America would
- permit moral considerations to preclude a company like Boeing
- from making a fortune in China. As everyone else has rushed
- to embrace China's markets, it has become clear that isolating
- Beijing is an impossibility.
- </p>
- <p> Second, the yearly threat to end MFN was having no effect on
- Beijing's leaders, who view even whispered rebukes as "unacceptable
- interference." As Clinton said last week, a proud Confucian
- culture that prizes order over liberty is especially reluctant
- to take steps perceived as kowtowing to U.S. pressure.
- </p>
- <p> Third, as the President understands, prosperity is often the
- best and sometimes the only route to freedom. Although "((economic))
- growth alone will not democratize China," said U.S. Senator
- Bill Bradley, whom Clinton invoked to defend his stance, "it
- creates a fluid political and social environment and the emergence
- of a class of prosperous Chinese--all of which fuel democratization.
- Evidence from South Korea and Taiwan shows that prosperity breaks
- down old controls and generates demands for improved political
- and social conditions."
- </p>
- <p> The courage to change is often the very definition of leadership,
- and this particular Clinton flip-flop is better yet because
- the President expressed his new position without the legalistic
- fudging that has too often characterized his tenure. This time
- a foolish and failed policy was forthrightly acknowledged to
- have outlived its "usefulness," and squarely junked.
- </p>
- <p> The President's resolve will be tested by those who deride his
- new policy as "trickle-down liberty." Human rights, democracy
- and trade are "linked inseparably and indivisibly," declared
- House of Representatives majority leader Richard Gephardt. Clinton's
- reversal "will encourage China's intransigence," added Senate
- majority leader George Mitchell. Rather than fight to revoke
- MFN altogether, these influential Democrats will soon seek to
- broaden the category of penalized products to exclude from the
- U.S. about $900 million in goods produced by China's army and
- its commercial partners. With many in Congress eager to demonstrate
- their toughness, that proposal could attract majority support.
- If it does, said Bradley, it could invite retaliation against
- U.S. exports to China "and antagonize a key actor ((the military))
- in China's succession struggle."
- </p>
- <p> Better to second the President's conversion. As George Bush
- said in 1991, before Clinton blasted him for "coddling" Beijing's
- dictators, "It is wrong to isolate China if we hope to influence
- it." Bush was right then. Clinton is right now.
- </p>
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-